Sunday, February 15, 2015

RSA #3-Profession Learning Community



Online Links:


A Professional Learning Community (PLC) is a group of educators or team members that meets regularly to share data and ideas, and works collaboratively to improve teaching practices and academic performance of students. PLCS enables teachers and staff to learn from one another and share what does work and what doesn’t work.  In order to create a Professional Learning Community, DuFour (2004) believes that there are four “big ideas” to implement.  The four big ideas are ensure student learning, create a culture of collaboration, focus on results, and have hard work and commitment.  Implementing and having a successful PLC is not easy, but the outcomes are worth it.

In the article provided by Ferguson (2013), school administration at Bayside Elementary struggles implementing a professional learning community without using additional funds. In order for a PLC to work schools need to make sure everyone must belong to a team and the teams must have time to meet during the workday (DuFour, 2004).  Bayside Elementary implemented two PLCS, one for instruction and one for assessment.  Assessment PLCS occur after school every two weeks for 30 minutes each.  During assessment PLCS teachers pick two students who are having difficultly in a subject matter and share concerns.  Many teachers miss assessment PLCS because they are dealing with students and parents after school. According to Ferguson (2014), teachers feel assessment PLCS are an added burden, too structured, and forced.  Instructional PLCS are held during school hours for 100 minutes once every month.  During instructional PLCS teachers discuss strategies they could use in their classroom.  Bayside struggles finding coverage for teachers during PLCS due to lack of funding.  They implemented “Buddy Days” where teachers of different grade levels supervise each other’s classes during PLCS.
     
In the article provided by Thompson, Gregg, and Niska (2004), described the 5 disciplines a learning organization needs to have in order to be a true professional learning community.  The fives disciplines include body of knowledge (understanding patterns and making changes), commitment to learning, mental modes (reflections), shared vision, and team learning.  These five disciplines mask the four “big ideas” DuFour believes a professional learning community needs to have. Not only did the article focus on the five disciplines, but also discussed the leadership and student learning in a PLC. According to Thompson, Gregg, and Niska (2004), teachers must be learners for students to learn.  Through studies the teams that had a strong collaboration had high math and reading achievement.  The collaboration did not have one leader, instead every team member was vital and important to the team.

Through these articles and class readings I can relate to the pros and cons of a professional learning community.  In my school of 600 students our professional learning communities are called team based team meetings (TBT) and are comprised of the teachers in our grade level.  We are required to meet two times a month during our common planning time. Just like the teachers in Organizing For Professional Learning Communities, our meetings are too structured and don’t allow for time to discuss any other matters outside of the data.  Since my team believes in the fourth big idea of DuFour, hard work and commitment, we set aside more time to meet to discuss other matters such as, parents, common planning, state testing, and student achievement.  Our TBT meetings do not have a leader, instead all of our voices are heard, we share ideas, and work together.  According to Thompson, Gregg, and Niska (2004), no single individual is more important than another individual in a team.
           
References

DuFour, R. (2004).  What is a "professional learning community? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6-11.

DuFour, R. (2011). Solution Tree: Rick DuFour on he Importance of PLCs. You Tube, Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnWDJFxfAKE


Provini, C. (2012). Best Practices for Professional Learning Communities. Education World, Retrieved from http://www.educationworld.com/a_admin/best-practices-for-professional-learning-communities.shtml


Thompson, S., Gregg, L., & Niska, J. (2004).  Professional learning communities, leadership, and student learning.  Research in Middle Level Education, 28(1).

Sunday, February 8, 2015

RSA #2-Project-Based Learning



Online Links:

Project Based Learning (PBL) is a teaching approach where students learn and gain knowledge through working on a project for a extended period of time.  Students will have to investigate and respond to a complex real world question or problem.  PBL requires students to be involved in the learning rather than memorizing facts. When students use project based learning, remembering the material is much longer and have healthier studies towards learning (Dauphin, 2013). The teacher plays the role of the facilitator just like in inquiry-based learning. Teachers create meaningful tasks, assess the learning, scaffold thinking and communication skills, and pose questions.   Ultimately, PBL exposes students to skills they will need and use in the workplace.

Ching and Hsu believe that online programs and courses in higher education lead to growing research on effective instructional strategies to promote and facilitate student’s learning. (2013) One of the instructional strategies that create a positive learning experience and inquiry thinking skills is PBL.  When reading about PBL and other teaching methods through course readings, most teachers think about students in lower level education (K-12) and how these strategies can be applied to them.  We can all see how we can fit PBL into our classroom when we are teaching, but how can PBL be used in the classroom that we are in as students? Ching and Hsu studied how PBL can work in an online setting for graduate students.  According to Ching and Hsu, solving real-life problems is motivating and encourages adult learners (2013).  Most PBL assignments in an online course require graduate students to solve a problem, facilitate knowledge, and share learning.  This study focused on how effective PBL is without having quality peer feedback.   The study indicated when students are asked to provide feedback of suggestions and assess how well their peer did, their learning experience was much higher than students whose feedback would relate to their own prior experiences.  Having the opportunity to provide peer feedback allows for higher order of learning opportunities (Ching & Hsu, 2013).

Flippatou and Kaldi (2010) also feel project-based learning has positive and meaningful effects on student growth.  In agreeance with Ching, Hsu, and course readings, Flipatou and Kaldi believe PBL requires students to become practical thinkers, engage in discovery, and explore the decision making process (2010). In this research Flipatou and Kaldi (2010) studied the effects of PBL on students with learning difficulties.  No matter if we teach special education students we can all relate to trying to support lower level thinkers in a classroom.  24 fourth grade students with learning difficulties studied the topic of sea animals in their project-based learning, which was interest among the students.  Students classified, studied the anatomy, reproduction, food, human nutrition, and local habitat the of the sea animals (Flipatou and Kaldi, 2010).  The students also had to work with group members to create a “dummy” aquarium. The results of this study indicated that students with learning difficulties showed little improvement in retaining knowledge of specific terminology of sea animals because most of them were facing working memory problems (Flipatou and Kaldi, 2010).  Even though retaining knowledge and terminologies lacked in this PBL activity, students with difficulties showed growth in expressing ideas, cooperative learning, self-efficiency, and researching.  Flipatou and Kaldi states, “Results showed that pupils enriched and expanded their knowledge on units studied mainly though hands-on, field based activities and experiential learning because it applies better to their educational needs” (2010).

While both studies of project-based learning had different learning outcomes they both support the method of project-based learning.  Project-Based Learning: Explained, states that learning can be more interesting and effective when students are involved in work that matters (2014).  Online graduate students and students with learning difficulties were both involved in work that mattered.  Whether the students were providing feedback to their peers in online discussions or collaborating in groups to study seas animals all students felt that their contribution mattered in the learning.  Teachers can use the key ideas underlying project-based learning in some measure in any classroom (David, 2008).

References


Flilippatou, D. & Kaldi, S. (2010).  The Effectiveness of Project-Based Learning on Pupils with Learning Difficulties Regarding Academic Performance, Group Work and Motivation.  International Journal of Special Education, 25(1).

(2014). Project Based Learning. You Tube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNNff-hVg2s
           

Lane, D. (2015). What Researchers Say About Project Based Learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved from
Dauphin, S.  (2013).  12 timeless project-based learning resources.   Retrieved from: http://www.teachthought.com/learning/project-based-learning/13-timeless-project-based-learning-resources/
Miller, A. (2014). Project-based learning and the common core: Resource roundup.   
(2010). Project Based Learning: Explained. You Tube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMCZvGesRz8



Sunday, February 1, 2015

RSA #1-Inquiry-Base Learning



Online Links:


Inquiry-based learning (IBL) is a teaching approach where students take control of their learning by asking questions and gathering information through experiences.  IBL requires teachers to discontinue direct instruction and become a facilitator in student lead learning.  Being that this method has educators giving away the control, educators wonder how does an inquiry-based learning environment work and where does technology fall into place?

First, educators need to understand the importance of using inquiry-based learning when teaching before applying it into their classroom. According to Workshop: Inquiry-Based Learning (2004), memorizing facts and information is not the most important skill in today’s world.  Information changes and facts are at the tip of our fingertips.  Learners now need to understand how to get the information and how to make sense of it all. Through IBL students are required to become problem solvers by asking questions and gathering information to answer the questions. In 20 Questions to Guide Inquiry-Based Learning (2013), the inquiry process has four student lead phases.   Phase one is to pose real questions, phase two is to find resources, phase three is to interrupt data, and phase four is to report findings.  Through these phases students are involved in their learning and dictating where the learning goes, when this happens students are more inclined to remember the experience (process) than remembering facts to understand a concept. 

After educators have understood the importance of using IBL they can then begin to apply it into their classroom.  To create an IBL environment does not require technology, but using technology through the process can keep motivation, expand curiosity, raise new questions, and provide many different resources. Hakverdi-Can and Sonmez (2012), support the use of technology in an inquiry-based learning environment, but with appropriate and valuable resources such as WebQuest. In “Learning How to Design a Technology Supported Inquiry-Based Learning” (2012) states, “Although technology integration benefits student learning there are challenges and limitations such as lack of time to design learning environments, teacher’s proficiency in technology, and the Internet.”  In contrast to what course readings and videos have stated Hakverdi-Can and Sonmez (2012) believes technology should be limited and researched in an inquiry-based learning environment. In the application they studied, WebQuest allows students to take responsibility of their learning, make real life connections, improve critical thinking, and make decisions.  Even though the viewpoints on the use of technology in inquiry-based learning are different the outcomes are still the same. 

In agreeance Li, Dyjur, Nicolson, and Moorman (2009) believe that in an inquiry-based learning environment explores the natural and material world, leads to asking questions, making discoveries, and new understanding.  Both support an IBL environment but are on the opposite ends of the spectrum on the resources technology provides.  In “Videoconferencing to Provide Mentorship in Inquiry-Bases Urban and Rural Secondary Classrooms” (2009) states, “Although inquiry holds promise for learning, there are concerns for limited access to resources.”  The limited access is especially a concern in rural communities.  Schools in rural communities do not have enough technology to build or help their IBL environment.  Videoconferencing with different communities provides the feeling of meeting the other person, gathering different viewpoints, making eye contact, and seeing other people’s expressions. Videoconferencing can provide schools with limited technology the opportunity to create an inquiry-based learning environment.


References

Hakverdi-Can, M. & Sonmez, D. (2012).  Learning How to Design a  Technology Supported Inquiry-Based Learning  environment.  Science Education International, 23(4), 3338-352.

Li, Q.,  Dyjur, P., Nicolson, N., & Moorman, L. (2009).  Using Videoconferencing to       Provide Mentorship in Inquiry-Bases Urban and Rural Secondary Classrooms.  Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 35(3).

(2014). Benefits of Inquiry-Based Learning. You Tube. Retrieved from             https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ylmVT5lkck

(2015). Inquiry Based Teaching: The Inquiry Approach. Teaching          Channel.  Retrieved from

(2004). Workshop: Inquiry-based learning.  Concept to classroom. Ed online. Retrieved from http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/inquiry/

(2013). 20 questions to guide inquiry-based learning.  Teacher Thought.  Retrieved from http://www.teachthought.com/learning/20-questions-guide-inquiry-based-learning/

(2013). What is IBL? Transformative experiences for students Academy of                                               inquiry-based learning. Retrieved from http://www.inquirybasedlearning.org/?page=What_is_IBL